Monday, February 25, 2019

Here’s Mud in Yer Eye!



Ptooey!

The sound of someone spitting is the pronunciation of the Greek word for that very same action [ἔπτυσεν / ptoo'-o / to spit] so it is the way the writer of John’s Gospel describes what Jesus does when encountering a man who had been blind [τυφλὸν / toof-los' / blind; mentally blind] from birth [γενετῆς / ghen-et-ay / birth, from birth].

Ptooey!

Probably doesn’t fit the image most of us have had of Jesus, right? But when his disciples assume that this blindness was caused by somebody’s sin [ἥμαρτεν / ham-ar-tan'-o / to be without a share in; to miss the mark], that is exactly his reaction.

Ptooey!

Jesus spits. Spits in the dirt. Maybe it comes across as a bit vulgar to our delicate sensibilities but it’s an important part of the sensuality of this story. This text is so earthy, so sensory that we can almost hear the sound ptooey!, feel the slimy clay mud [πηλὸν / pay-los' / potters clay; mud; wet clay] used to anoint [ἐπέχρισεν / ep-ee-khree'- / to spread on, anoint] this man’s eyes, feel the warm breath of Jesus as he pulls the man in close to speak words of healing, taste the sweat pouring from our own brows as our beliefs about sin and righteousness are called to task. It’s a sensory experience extraordinaire.

⋈

“Here’s mud in yer eye!” is an old saying originating probably in early 20th century America when farmers clinked glasses just before plow-time, wishing each other a good season since a plentiful crop would follow lots of rain and the mud it created. Or maybe as Frank Kelly Rich’s “On the Cuff & Under the Table: The Origin and History of Drinking Words and Phrases”—yes, it’s a real book—reads:
This toast may have been popular with the soldiers slogging through the muddy trenches of WWI, but it did not originate with them, as many believe. It was being bandied about in U.S. saloons as early as 1890 and was popular with the English fox hunting and race horse crowd before then. Most likely it’s a back-handed toast among jockeys, meaning “Here’s to you losing the race.” If you’ve ever been to a race track after a good rain, you’ll note that the leading horses throw up a lot a mud and the trailing jockeys tend to get splattered from head to toe. The phrase was all the more pertinent before the introduction of goggles to the sport.

“Here’s mud in yer eye!” says Jesus to the unsuspecting man who had been blind from birth, an encounter set in six scenes.

Scene 1.
As he walked along, [Jesus] saw a man blind from birth. His disciples asked him, “Rabbi, who sinned, this man or his parents, that he was born blind?” Jesus answered, “Neither this man nor his parents sinned; he was born blind so that God’s works might be revealed in him. We must work the works of him who sent me while it is day; night is coming when no one can work. As long as I am in the world, I am the light of the world.” When he had said this, he spat on the ground and made mud with the saliva and spread the mud on the man’s eyes, saying to him, “Go, wash in the pool of Siloam” (which means Sent). Then he went and washed and came back able to see. (John 9:1-7)

Jesus spits in the dirt, mixes up some mud, places it on the man’s eyes … and the man is incredibly blessed because he can now see … and he lives happily ever after. Is that how the story goes?  Restored sight equals God’s blessing?  Healing equals full welcome into the “in” crowd?  That might be how we want to read the story but that’s not quite how it all went down.  

Jesus spits in the dirt, mixes up some mud, places it on the man’s eyes …  and the man’s life is turned upside down, inside out, flipped and twisted, and made much more difficult than it ever had been before. That’s how the story actually reads.  

Jesus is there for Scene 1—the spit and mud—and then while the man is off washing in the Pool, Jesus disappears and doesn’t return until the very last scene. In the meantime while Jesus is gone, here is the man’s “blessing.”

Scene 2.
The neighbors and those who had seen him before as a beggar began to ask, “Is this not the man who used to sit and beg?” Some were saying, “It is he.” Others were saying, “No, but it is someone like him.” He kept saying, “I am the man.” But they kept asking him, “Then how were your eyes opened?” He answered, “The man called Jesus made mud, spread it on my eyes, and said to me, ‘Go to Siloam and wash.’ Then I went and washed and received my sight.” They said to him, “Where is he?” He said, “I do not know.” (John 9:8-12)

The healed man tries to go home again but he can’t. So radical is the change in him that his reappearance in his old neighborhood generates no joy, no celebration, no welcome home, only questions and doubts.  His neighbors don’t even recognize him now when before this he was well-known in the neighborhood. 

“That’s the guy who sits and begs, the guy who can’t see, poor guy.” 

“Let’s give him some food leftover from dinner last night.”

“Let’s give him a coin or two.”

And the mostly unspoken feelings: “Let’s do whatever we can to assuage the guilt we have inside us. Let’s engage him enough to say that we did and so we can suppress the ‘It could have been me’ thoughts that run through our minds.”  

He has been treated his whole life as most people with disabilities. Pitied, ignored, shunned, rejected. And now that suddenly the community has to “see” him, he has to insist that he is the same man, a plea  which gains mixed responses. He was no longer the guy who stumbled his way through the streets, the guy who touched the walls as his hesitantly walked to his begging place, the dependent, poor, dirty beggar—these were the identity markers that defined his place in the community. Now he walks upright, assured of place and direction, and now he has a potential for being independent. What he discovers, though, is that he has no place anymore.

“Who are you? And who is this person who told you you could be whole? Where is he?”

Jesus is nowhere to be found.

Scene 3.
They brought to the Pharisees the man who had formerly been blind. Now it was a sabbath day when Jesus made the mud and opened his eyes. Then the Pharisees also began to ask him how he had received his sight. He said to them, “He put mud on my eyes. Then I washed, and now I see.” Some of the Pharisees said, “This man is not from God, for he does not observe the sabbath.” But others said, “How can a man who is a sinner perform such signs?” And they were divided. So they said again to the blind man, “What do you say about him? It was your eyes he opened.” He said, “He is a prophet.” (John 9:13-17)

The healed man is hauled before religious leaders who have their own identity markers in the community. They are interested in all reported miracles, especially if performed by unauthorized individuals and most especially if done in violation of some law. They protect the law, the law protects their role.

Such is the case here. The healing occurred on the sabbath so if this man is truly healed, it was done by someone with the power of God, but if the healing took place on the sabbath, then it was done by someone opposing God’s law and these well-placed authorities could not possibly allow someone to question their interpretation of God’s law. Protect the law at all costs.

“Are you sure you can see? Were you really blind? Who did it? Further investigation is needed.”

Like many of us wanting to defend the status quo, these religious leaders already knew what they wanted to hear—they wanted to hear that this healer healed on the Sabbath and that by doing so he broke the law. And that’s exactly where their investigation leads—surprise!

In the meantime, this man is dragged through the mud and his self, his integrity, his parents, his very existence are questioned and debated and disparaged in front of his neighbors and his synagogue. 

Jesus is nowhere to be found.

Scene 4.
The [religious leaders] did not believe that he had been blind and had received his sight until they called the parents of the man who had received his sight and asked them, “Is this your son, who you say was born blind? How then does he now see?” His parents answered, “We know that this is our son, and that he was born blind; but we do not know how it is that now he sees, nor do we know who opened his eyes. Ask him; he is of age. He will speak for himself.” His parents said this because they were afraid of the Jews; for the Jews had already agreed that anyone who confessed Jesus to be the Messiah would be put out of the synagogue. Therefore his parents said, “He is of age; ask him. He will speak for himself.” (John 9:18-21)

Again, like so many of us with disabilities, the man is not believed so the parents of the healed man are grilled by the religious leaders.

“Yes, he is our son.”

“Yes, he was born blind.”

“No, we do not know what happened.”

“No, we do not know who did it.”

“Of course we know it’s our son and that he was born blind, but we don’t know how this change has happened.”

Whatever joy they may have had in discovering that their son was now a sighted person was wiped out by fear of themselves being shunned from the community.

“Ask him; he is of age. He will speak for himself.” 

They were on the verge of being expelled from the synagogue and being socially disgraced because of their connection to this ungodly, sabbath-violating, law-breaking act. But these parents didn’t ask for this. This “blessing” was too much for them to handle.

“Give us our son back. We liked our life just the way it was, thank you very much. This other way is way too difficult.” 

Jesus is nowhere to be found.

Scene 5.
So for the second time they called the man who had been blind, and they said to him, “Give glory to God! We know that this man is a sinner.” He answered, “I do not know whether he is a sinner. One thing I do know, that though I was blind, now I see.” They said to him, “What did he do to you? How did he open your eyes?” He answered them, “I have told you already, and you would not listen. Why do you want to hear it again? Do you also want to become his disciples?” Then they reviled him, saying, “You are his disciple, but we are disciples of Moses. We know that God has spoken to Moses, but as for this man, we do not know where he comes from.” The man answered, “Here is an astonishing thing! You do not know where he comes from, and yet he opened my eyes. We know that God does not listen to sinners, but he does listen to one who worships him and obeys his will. Never since the world began has it been heard that anyone opened the eyes of a person born blind. If this man were not from God, he could do nothing.” They answered him, “You were born entirely in sins, and are you trying to teach us?” And they drove him out. (John 9:22-34)

The religious authorities, faced with irrefutable evidence that a healing happened know that they must now denounce the healer as a sinner. But the healed man argued back. How cheeky of him! 

“I do not know whether [Jesus] is a sinner. One thing I do know, that though I was blind, now I see. ... Maybe you want to be his follower?”

This is not the pre-determined answers the authorities want to hear, not the expected conclusion of the investigation, not the statement that was supposed to be released to the public. That report was supposed to say, “Obviously it was Jesus who sinned and therefore this man he healed cannot be believed and is no longer to be a part of who we are.”  The official report was supposed to exonerate the officials, not raise more questions and stymie their plans for higher office.

So here is this guy.  A few days before he was ejected from the synagogue his life was as it always had been. And then God “blessed” him with:  
  • his old friends don’t recognize him
  • his neighbors disregard him
  • his parents are threatened
  • his parents reject him
  • he is no longer welcome at his old place of worship 
So that's a blessing?!

Jesus is nowhere to be found.

Scene 6.
Jesus heard that they had driven [the man] out, and when he found him, he said, “Do you believe in the Son of Man?” He answered, “And who is he, sir? Tell me, so that I may believe in him.” Jesus said to him, “You have seen him, and the one speaking with you is he.” He said, “Lord, I believe.” And he worshiped him. Jesus said, “I came into this world for judgment so that those who do not see may see, and those who do see may become blind.” Some of the Pharisees near him heard this and said to him, “Surely we are not blind, are we?” Jesus said to them, “If you were blind, you would not have sin. But now that you say, ‘We see,’ your sin remains.” (John 9:35-41)

Jesus returns. Whew!

To this point, remember, the man has not seen Jesus. When they were last together, the man was blind and after he returned from the Pool at Siloam Jesus was gone. “Guess what,” says Jesus, “I came into this world for judgment so that those who do not see may see, and those who do see may become blind.” The man is now seen by the world around him and the world rejects him.

So that’s the deal? God’s blessings may very well bring judgment. God’s blessings may very well cause your life to be turned upside down. God’s blessings might just cause you to be ousted from those institutions which the world around you values. God’s blessings might just bring persecution and ridicule on you.

But guess what? God’s blessings are God’s blessings. If the world rejects them, guess who is in the wrong?   

⋈

From the very beginning of Scene 1, Jesus makes it clear that this man’s blindness has nothing to do with sin—not his nor his parents’ sin. Period. Jesus then says that the man is there so that “the works of God might be revealed.”

Does that mean that the man was born blind so that Jesus could come along, spit in the dirt, heal him, and in that we can experience God’s power? That makes for a pretty capricious god, doesn’t it? A god that would cause blindness just to prove that that god has the power to heal does not reflect the loving God of our faith.

Our insistence on long-held stereotypes about disabilities and their relationship to sin or bad decisions or evil living, unconscious or latent as those beliefs might be in our modern minds, still bring us to simplistic interpretations like this. A more enlightened reading is that God has created each one of us—not just the man in this story but all of us, in fact—so that God’s works can be revealed in and through our lives.

Remember, Jesus has no qualms about this man’s blindness. Jesus was walking through John’s Gospel, minding his own—and God’s—business when he came across this unnamed man.  His disciples assumed that because the man did not have his visual sense intact he or his parents must be sinners. “Ptooey!,” says Jesus to his once-again-confused disciples, “one’s disability has nothing to do with sin.”

There’s no pity in this encounter. Jesus’ response is not, “Oh, poor little blind man. Let me take away your affliction. Let me make you whole again.” Just as in all stories of people with disabilities in scripture, Jesus doesn’t even notice the man’s disability, his blindness—he simply sees the man—and note that the man doesn’t ask to have his blindness taken away—he’s fine with it. The encounter is quite simply about us experiencing God’s revealed awesomeness. If it takes bringing a man’s visual sense back to life, then that’s what Jesus is willing to do to get that message across.

This story is not about the man’s physical blindness. It’s not about his or his parents’ sin. It’s not about what Jesus could or couldn’t do. It’s not about determining where healing comes from. It’s not about categorization or segregation or exclusion of people based on ability. It’s not about Jesus making a point about all of us and our single-vision view of the world around us.

Or is it? Maybe it’s about all of those things. But primarily it is about what happens when we listen to God’s message and are truly blessed by God.  It changes us.

⋈

Cesar Chavez, who led among California migrant farm workers a non-violent movement built on a foundation of humility, speaking truth to power, and making sure the voice of the poor was heard, famously said “If the poor aren’t included, nothing will ever change.”

That’s what this Gospel lesson is about. In fact, that’s what the entirety of the Jesus message is about.  “If the poor aren’t included …” Or fill in whoever is marginalized and you have the message … if the children aren’t included … if the women aren’t included … if the men .., if the elderly … if the people who look different than me.

And as to this encounter between Jesus and the man born blind and the doubters … if those who can’t walk … those who can’t speak … if those who can’t see aren’t included … nothing will ever change. That’s what Jesus does here. Inclusion of everyone in this story—the disciples, the man born blind, his parents, the neighbors, the Pharisees, you and me.  If we’re paying attention, change happens and we just might learn or unlearn some things:
  • Our sins have no bearing on our abilities and our potentialities—we inherently know this but we need to keep reminding ourselves
  • Each of us sins when we distance ourselves from each other and from God, when we push ourselves away and refuse to touch and be touched
  • God works in and around all of us and God’s works are revealed in each and every life that has ever been created
  • Some of us are born blind and see clearly while others are born with vision but simply choose to not see
  • At times we treat each other so badly that some of us have to beg for food or money or shelter or health care or even simple compassion
  • Our parents don’t know everything about us; children know very little about their parents
  • At times we get so hung up on the rules that we have created that we fail to see the glory that God has created
  • It’s okay—healing, even—to play in the mud
    And if real change happens, once oppression ends you cannot return to bondage. If true change happens then the man-who-had-been-blind now restored to wholeness would never be excluded again. It doesn’t really matter—and it didn’t really matter to Jesus—if the man could physically see using his eyes or if that form of vision stayed with him after Jesus went on his way. What mattered was that Jesus has taken this man and has restored him to the community. A painful process when the community doesn’t want to admit it is wrong and has to change. But it happens. This man is restored, healed, reconciled, into a community that, we pray, has learned to change.

And obviously the mud in your eye—in our eyes—didn’t resolve the marginalization of those whom we reject.  But with the Jesus message as clear as mud in the eye, we continue to share that message as we live out God’s will in this world.

Ptooey! Here’s mud in yer eye!


© Copyright 2019
James F. McIntire
All rights reserved. 


Monday, February 11, 2019

Falling ... With Style


Woody, the skinny, flop-armed cowboy in Pixar’s Toy Story, is Andy’s favorite toy. As Andy’s toy collection anxiously awaits the big reveal of this year’s birthday present—Mr. Potato Head is always hoping for a Mrs. Potato Head—they are filled with apprehension as Buzz Lightyear enters the scene. Andy bursts through the bedroom door, flings Woody off the coveted spot on the bed, plops the newest toy on the pillow, then exits.

The new toy is Buzz Lightyear, Space Ranger. Woody climbs back up and introduces himself explaining that there must be some mistake about his placement on the bed. It becomes apparent that Buzz doesn’t realize that he’s a toy and that he thinks he’s the real Buzz Lightyear, TV star and protector of the universe.

As Woody tries to defend himself and discredit Buzz, Buzz earns the admiration of all of the other toys because he has all kinds of lights and gadgets on his space suit. When asked if he can fly, he pushes a button and out pop his wings.  

“Oooo! Ahhhh…” the toys respond.  

“Impressive wingspan.  Very good.,” says the Piggy Bank.  

“These are plastic!” Woody whines his plea to the others.  

“They’re a trillium, carbonic alloy,” says Buzz, “And I can fly.”  

“You can’t fly,” Woody insists.  

“Can to,” says Buzz.  

“Can’t!”

“Can!”
  
“Can’t!”

“Can!  I can fly around this room with my eyes closed,” Buzz insists as he walks to the edge of the bed, climbs up onto the rounded bed post, closes his eyes, shouts, “To infinity … and beyond,” and dives off the bed.

Buzz plummets head first toward the floor, his helmet bounces him off a huge plastic ball, he does a midair flip, lands on a Hot Wheel car poised at the top of its track, rides it down the track, around the loop, and off the ramp which propels him up to the ceiling where he gets caught in an airplane hanging by a string which spins him around and around and around until finally he is thrown off and glides back down to the bed with a perfect, feet first landing right in front of Woody’s face, opens his eyes and says:

“CAN!”

While the other toys cheer “Whooaa!” and applaud Buzz’s flying, Woody mumbles loud enough for everyone to hear, “That wasn’t flying. It was falling … with style.” 
         
z

 Near the end of the 1990s at age 38 I slipped into an emotional black hole that required a two-month sabbatical from my pastoral responsibilities. It was like diving off the end of a bed with my eyes closed to prove that I could fly but finding out that all I could really do was fall … with style.

I left for my renewal time about as deep in depression as I ever want to be. Depression is not new in my life but rather a kind of consistent thread which weaves its way in and out at certain times and in various ways. I have learned to mask it—pretty well I think from the way people respond when they learn. To reveal it publicly at that moment in my life and my career—to people that I loved and trusted so dearly—was not easy. I dove off the bedpost into vulnerability and uncertainty. I had two options—I could crawl up in the corner of my sofa and sleep the days away or I could do something constructive with the time and focus on my life and what it means to fully live it.   

z

 6 AM, Thursday morning, the phone woke me. I am not one that usually sees the world in that kind of early dawn haze so I knew I was about to face something unusual.

In September 1988 I was in my last year of seminary and was serving a small church in suburban Philadelphia. A high school friend asked me if I would be interested in performing a wedding—his sister wanted to get married. It would be my first wedding so sure I could do it. After all, I was almost through seminary, I was ordained a deacon by the United Methodist Church, I had my own church. Of course I could do it.

I dragged out my notes from Pastoral Care 101 and reviewed what I should do when I met with Susan and Kevin for a few sessions before the wedding—talk about some family history, find out how much they knew about each other, see if any red flags pop-up, set the date and time. They were mature adults. She had been married before. We were ready.

The Thursday before the wedding my friend was calling me at 6 AM. No one had heard from Kevin for a few days. He had driven here from the West Coast and arrived safely, we knew that, but Susan had no idea where he was now and she was getting worried. We all began calling around to hospitals and the State Police but no one had any information. We waited the day out but heard nothing.

7 PM, Thursday night. I was at the church for choir rehearsal when my office phone rang. Susan. They found Kevin at a nearby State Park but something had happened and he was now at the hospital. I told her I would call to see what I could find out.  

“I heard he was brought in by ambulance.” I was talking to the nurse-in-charge, “Is he all right?”

“Who are you?,” she asked.
  
“I’m the pastor that is marrying Kevin and his fiancé on Saturday,” I replied. “We’ve been searching for him all day.”

There was a pause.
  
“I’m sorry. Kevin has died,” she told me. “He apparently jumped off a cliff at the Park despite police efforts to talk him down.  I’m very sorry,” she said.

I was in shock. I called back to Susan to let her know—she couldn’t believe it, it must have been a mistake, she sobbed, and I could feel through the phone her body slump over into a heap of grief. It took me an hour to get to her house where we talked and cried together. I wasn’t sure what to do—“I wasn’t a real pastor yet, was I?”  My friend and his wife arrived from their day of searching for Kevin and since none of us had cell phones in 1988 they hadn’t heard the news.

I met them on the front lawn with the news. “I’m glad you’re in the ministry, Jim.  This is where you belong,” my friend told me.

Instead of my first wedding on Saturday, I presided over my first funeral on Sunday afternoon. I don’t know how I got through it—I don’t know how anyone got through it—but we did.  At worship on Sunday morning I had preached on a text from the Letter of James: “For you are a mist that appears for a little while and then vanishes.” (James 4:14)  Apparently that’s what Kevin thought, that his life meant nothing, that it was just a mist and then it was gone.  But that’s not true, I told the congregation. God has created each of us and we are each important and valuable and loved. Our lives are more than just a vanishing mist that’s here one day and gone the next. A man at the back of the church sat in his pew and sobbed through the closing hymn.

Kevin didn’t understand the value of life and his suicide was a tragedy that no one understood.

z

 What would get me through this personal depression 9 years later? Is my life simply a mist that appears and then vanishes like James says?  Or is what Paul wrote to the church at Corinth more compelling? “We do not lose heart. Even though our outer nature is wasting away, our inner nature is being renewed day by day. For this slight momentary affliction is preparing us for an eternal weight of glory beyond all measure, because we look not at what can be seen but at what cannot be seen; for what can be seen is temporary, but what cannot be seen is eternal.” (2 Corinthians 4:16-18)

I chose Paul.

I decided at the beginning of my renewal leave that I would spend a lot of time reading and writing and studying—but I didn’t. Instead I spent time sorting through the junk on my workbench in the basement getting my nuts and bolts separated from my screws—important work you know! And I rearranged my study at home so it was more comfortable. I surrounded myself with photos of my grandparents and my parents and my kids so that I could see the faces of those who have always loved me.

But I also started sorting through the emotional nuts and screws. I started therapy, I joined a clergy peer group, I did vocational counseling. I learned from a Myers-Briggs test that I am an EFSJ—Extroverted, Sending, Feeling, Judging—and that that personality type is what makes me do what I do. How’s that for some revelation, huh? I learned that I have trouble expressing my anger. “Oh, you too?,” a friend said, “Along with all of us other white males?”  

But perhaps the most important thing that I discovered was that I needed to learn to be more direct and open and revealing. Vulnerable. I returned to the pulpit and dove full in. I revealed that it was difficult to be public about my depression and to admit that I needed the time away because it connected me so closely to my dad’s reality. My dad whose life I had shared in sermons and stories, who because of a WWII amputation stood on one leg to face the world, who taught me about faith, who was my friend and my hero—my dad took his own life in January of 1983 after a long and painful struggle with PTSD and depression.

I spoke the reality of that life-altering trauma into public existence for the first time. Stigma, shame, conspiracy of silence, guilt and doubt had hidden that piece of me deep down in my ESFJ psyche. It took being shaken by my roots to be public about it but there it was, revealed in a very public way, simply because it was time. The sky didn’t turn blood-red nor did the ground open and swallow me. I found it, in fact, quite freeing and healing. It had been a painful, daily, secret journey through the 14 years between 1983 and 1997 but it is part of who I am. This greatest of all men saw no way out and so his life vanished like a mist.

And I did not want that to happen to me.

z

The shame and secrecy and doubt and fear of my dad’s life-end was what was in my head when I had to face that wedding-turned-funeral in 1988. I was terrified because my wound was still so raw and still so secret. My friend who asked me to do the wedding for his sister had known my dad, knew that my dad had died five years before, but he didn’t know, I believe, the circumstances. Or maybe he did and was complicit in my conspiracy.

When I had to face the reality of a soon-to-be groom choosing to plunge to his death rather than land at the altar my anxiety was heightened and my confrontation of my own fears became even more real.

Those feelings flooded back into my life in 1997. 

z

I arrived at the end of my renewal time. Healing, but not healed; depressed, but aware of it; looking at the future and counting on it. So Paul it was. I was not simply a “mist that appears and then vanishes.” I was at a place where though my “outer nature” might be wasting away I had not “lost heart” and I came to know my “inner nature was being renewed day by day.” Like Buzz Lightyear, I took a chance at flying and bounced off a few things so that I could finally land on my feet and prove that I could fly.

At the end of that movie, Buzz realizes that he really is only a toy and that he really can’t fly. To catch up with the moving van as it heads for Andy’s new house, Woody lights a fireworks rocket that the nasty neighbor kid had strapped to Buzz’s back. They blast into the air and once the rocket blows out, Buzz spreads his wings and heads for the open sun roof of Andy’s mom’s car.

“You’re flying,” yells Woody as he holds desperately onto Buzz’s back.  

“No,” says Buzz, “I’m falling … with style.”  

That may just be the best metaphor for my life, or maybe for any life actually. There are times when we realize that we are falling rather than flying. But if we stay true to ourselves and can find that there is a way forward, we can do it ... with style. And just maybe we are flying despite it all.

© 2019. James F. McIntire. All rights reserved.